Discussion about this post

User's avatar
LBALL's avatar

Yes, I agree that a COS resolution should happen. However, if we specify that Washington cannot spend beyond what it takes in, there must be a cap on what that intake is. If not, they will continue to increase taxes on all and we will still fall. We must be clear on the resolution. A balanced budget based on intake with no limits on what they can take is not the answer, it is part of the answer. So, we must be clear and read the small print and make sure they cannot continue to enslave us all.

Everything must be on the table. We watch GOV/State and County employees retire more than they do when working with minimal personal financial input and the person next door who worked outside of these agencies retire with what they saved. That needs to stop as well. Agency employees need to have the same benefits as their employers, the US taxpayer outside of these agencies.

The option of hard cap on federal spending tied to a percentage of GDP may be a start and a way to help manage expectations. But we MUST limit what can be taken, limit terms, limit benefits, and retirement packages as well.

Expand full comment
Debbie's avatar

Why, oh why would people be against an article V convention? Just doesn't make sense

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts